Madhyamakāvatāra

Supplement to the Middle Way

Commentary by the Venerable Geshe Doga

 

 

Translated by the Venerable Tenzin Dongak

 

 

Outline with links to transcripts, discussions and tests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tara Institute
3 Mavis Avenue
East Brighton 3187


Madhyamakāvatāra
Supplement to the Middle Way

Commentary by the Venerable Geshe Doga

Homage

5 March 2002

[Introductory sections]

12 March 2002

Meaning of the Title {1.}

Translator's Prostration {2.}

Meaning of the Text {3.}

Homage-Method for Starting to Compose the Commentary {1.}

Praising Great Compassion Without Discerning Compassion Individually {1.1.}

19 March 2002

Compassion as the Main Cause of a Bodhisattva {1.1.1.}

26 March 2002

Showing the Three Main Causes of Bodhisattvas {1.1.1.}

Showing Great Compassion to also be the Root of the Other Two Causes of a Bodhisattva {1.1.2.}

2 April 2002 (d)

9 April 2002 (t)

16 April 2002

Praising Compassion by Discerning Them Individually {1.2.}

Prostration to Compassion Focussing on Sentient Beings {1.2.1.}

23 April 2002

30 April 2002

Compassion Focussing on Dharmas and Non-Focus {1.2.2.}

7 May 2002

14 May 2002 (d)

28 May 2002 (t)

4 June 2002

The Actual Body of the Text {2.}

The Causal Grounds {2.1.}

The Way of Practising the Path on the Basis of One's Present Rebirth {2.1.1.}

The Way of Practising the Path as an Ordinary Bodhisattva {2.1.2.}

11 June 2002

The Way of Practising the Path as an Arya Bodhisattva {2.1.3.}

The Presentation of the Ten Bodhisattva Grounds in General {2.1.3.1.}

Explaining the Ten Bodhisattva Grounds Individually {2.1.3.2.}

Explaining the First Five Grounds {2.1.3.2.1.}

Chapter 1: Extremely Joyful

Nature of the Ground {1.}

18 June 2002

Showing Extensively the Qualities of the Ground {2.}

The Qualities Beautifying the Continuum of the Practitioner {2.1.}

Explaining Those Qualities Individually {2.1.1.}

The Quality of Having Attained a Meaningful Name {2.1.1.1.}

The Four Qualities of Being Born into the Lineage and so forth {2.1.1.2.}

25 June 2002

The Three Qualities of Conquering Higher Grounds and so forth {2.1.1.3.}

Showing the Qualities in a Condensed Manner {2.1.2.}

The Qualities of Outshining the Continuum of Others {2.2.}

Outshining Hearers and Self-Liberators Through Lineage {2.2.1.}

Outshining Both Hearers and Self-Liberators on the Seventh Ground Through Awareness {2.2.2.}

2 July 2002 (d)

9 July 2002 (t)

16 July 2002

The Way a Bodhisattva on the Seventh Ground Outshines the Hearers and Self-liberator Vehicles Through Awareness {2.2.2.}

Explaining the Meaning That Has Been Established Through the Previous Points {2.2.3.}

Showing that the Sutra of the Ten Bhumis Explains that Hearers and Self-liberators Realise Phenomena as Lacking Natural Existence {2.2.3.1.}

Clarification of the Thought of Chandrakirti {2.2.3.1.1.}

23 July 2002

Showing this also to be according to the Bodhisattva Charyavatara {2.2.3.1.2.; p.}

30 July 2002

Sources Proving That Hearers and Self- Liberators Need to Realise Emptiness in Order to Attain Liberation {2.2.3.2.}

Mahayana Sutras {2.2.3.2.1.}

Commentaries and Hinayana Sutras {2.2.3.2.2.}

6 August 2002

Eliminating Doubt {2.2.3.3.}

Eliminating Doubts Outlined in Chandrakirti’s Self Commentary {2.2.3.3.1.}

Eliminating Doubts Not Mentioned in the {2.2.3.3.2.}

The Superiority of the Perfection {2.3.}

Explaining the Generosity of the First Ground {2.3.1.}

Explaining Generosity of a Lower Base {2.3.2.}

Attaining Samsaric Happiness Through Generosity {2.3.2.1.}

Attaining the Happiness of Nirvana Through Generosity {2.3.2.2.}

13 August 2002 (d)

20 August 2002 (t)

27 August 2002

Showing the Uncommon Benefits of a Bodhisattva’s Generosity {2.3.3.}

Showing Generosity to be the Main Advice for Both Bases {2.3.3.1.}

Showing Which Joy Bodhisattvas Experience at the Time of Generosity {2.3.3.2.; p.}

Showing Whether or Not Bodhisattvas Experience Pain at the Time of Giving Away Their Body {2.3.3.3.}

The Divisions of the Perfection of Generosity {2.3.4.}

Qualities of the Ground: {3.}

Chapter 2: The second ground, Stainless

3 September 2002

Showing Morality on This Ground to be Extremely Pure {1.}

Showing Morality on this Ground to be Perfect {1.1.}

Showing the Related Qualities to be Very Pure {1.2.}

Showing its morality to be superior to that on the first ground {1.3.}

Showing the Other Cause of Completely Pure Morality {1.4.}

10 September 2002

Practising Morality {2.}

Enjoying the fruits of generosity and happy migrations depends upon morality {2.1.}

Enjoying the fruits of generosity continuously depends upon morality {2.2.}

Showing it to be extremely difficult to be liberated from the lower realms if separated from morality {2.3.}

The reason for teaching morality subsequently to generosity {2.4.}

Praising morality as the cause for both higher status and definite goodness {2.5.}

17 September 2002

Metaphor for being unmixed with the opposite of morality {3.}

Divisions of morality {4.}

Concluding briefly by expressing the qualities of the ground {5.}

Chapter 3: The third ground, Luminous

Description of the ground - basis of the characteristics {1.}

Explaining the characteristics of the ground {2.}

Showing Patience to be Superior on this Ground {2.1.}

The Way of Relying on Other Types of Patience {2.2.}

Showing that it is Inappropriate to be Angry {2.2.1.}

Anger Is Inappropriate Because It Has No Purpose and Great Disadvantages {2.2.1.1.}

24 September 2002 (d)

1 October 2002 (t)

8 October 2002

To retaliate is contradictory to not desiring subsequent suffering {2.2.1.2.}

Anger is inappropriate because it destroys the virtue accumulated over long periods of time {2.2.1.3.}

Meaning of the text {2.2.1.3.1.}

Ancillary Meanings {2.2.1.3.2.}

Stopping Anger After Having Contemplated the Many Faults of Impatience {2.2.1.4.}

15 October 2002

Contemplating the Many Benefits of Patience. {2.2.2.}

Outlining the Individual Benefits of Patience {2.2.2.1.}

Advice to Rely on Patience as a Short Summary {2.2.2.2.}

Divisions of the Perfection of Patience {2.3.}

Showing the Other Pure Qualities Arising on This Ground {2.4.}

Qualities of Realisation {2.4.1.}

Qualities of Abandonment {2.4.2.}

22 October 2002

The Characteristics of the First Three Perfections {3.}

Summarising Briefly by Expressing the Qualities of the Ground {4.}

Chapter 4: The fourth ground, Radiant

Showing enthusiasm to be superior on this ground {1.}

29 October 2002

Showing Enthusiasm to be Superior on this Ground {1.}

Description of the Ground {2.}

Showing the Attributes of Abandonment?? {3.}

Chapter 5: The fifth ground, Difficult to Train

Description of the Ground {1.}

Showing Mental Stabilisation as Superior and Having Expertise in Truth {2.}

Chapter 6: The sixth ground, The Manifest

5 November 2002 (d)

12 November 2002 (t)

19 November 2002

Description of the Ground and Showing the Perfection of Wisdom to be Supreme {1.}

Praise of the Perfection of Wisdom {2.}

Explaining the Suchness of Dependent Arising {3.}

26 November 2002

Pledging to Explain the Profound {3.1.}

Identifying the Vessel for the Profound {3.2.}

The Way the Ensuing Qualities Are Generated {3.3.}

3 December 2002

Exhorting the Student Who Is a Vessel to Listen {3.1.}

10 December 2002

4 March 2003

Explaining the Suchness of Dependent Arising {3.}

The Way Suchness of Dependent Arising Is Explained {3.5.}

How the Ultimate Meaning Is Explained Through Scripture {3.5.1.}

Stating How Suchness Is Explained Through Scripture {3.5.1.1.}

11 March 2003

Identifying What Is Discordant With Knowing Suchness {3.5.1.2.}

Identifying True Grasping According to the Svatantrika Madhyamika Tenet {3.5.1.2.1.}

Identifying True Existence and True Grasping [According to Svatantrikas] {3.5.1.2.1.1.}

Showing what is true and false according to worldly perception with the example of illusion [Svatantrika view]{3.5.1.2.1.2.}

18 March 2003

Explaining True and False Existence with the Metaphor of Illusion and the Illusionist {3.5.1.2.1.1.2.}

Applying the Example to the Meaning {3.5.1.2.1.1.3.}

Object of Negation According to the Prasangika {3.5.1.2.2.}

The Presentation of Being Posited Through the Power of Conception {3.5.1.2.2.1.}

25 March 2003

Showing how grasping at the reverse of merely labelled by conception is true grasping {3.5.1.2.2.2.}

1 April 2003 (d)

8 April 2003 (t)

15 April 2003

The way emptiness is established by valid reasoning {3.5.2.}

Establishing the selflessness of phenomena through reason {3.5.2.1.}

Negating generation from the two extremes on the basis of both truths {3.5.2.1.1.}

Asserting the thesis of the lack of inherent generation {3.5.2.1.1.1.}

22 April 2003

Establishing the thesis through reasoning {3.5.2.1.1.2.}

Refuting generation from self {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.}

Refutation with the reasoning from the Commentary {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.; p.}

Refuting the tenet holders asserting the realisation of suchness {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.}

Refuting generation from a cause that is of one nature (with the effect) {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.}

The consequential meaninglessness if generated from a cause that is of one nature with it {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.}

Being contrary to reason if so generated {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.2.}

Refuting Objections {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.3.}

Refuting cause and effect being of one nature {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.2.}

Refutation with the consequence that the shape etc. of seed and sprout would become one {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.2.1.}

Refuting the answer of the Samkhya to that consequence {{3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.2.2.}

29 April 2003

Refutation with the consequence of concomitant apprehension {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.2.3.}

Its non-existence also according to common convention {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.2.}

Summary of the refutation {3.3.2.1.1.2.1.1.3.}

Refutation through the reasoning of Root Wisdom {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.2.}

Refutation of [generation of] self from other {3.5.2.1.1.2.2.}

Stating the previous position {3.5.2.1.1.2.2.1.}

Refuting the position of generation from other {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.}

Refuting generation from other in general{3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.}

The actual refutation of generation from other {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.1.}

The general refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.}

6 May 2003

Refutation by impossible consequence {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.1.}

Rejecting objections to that {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.2.1.}

Rejecting the refutation (this heading is a bit out) {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.2.2.}

Particular refutation {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.}

Refuting generation from other in relation to consecutive cause and effect {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.}

The actual refutation {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.1.}

13 May 2003 (d)

20 May 2003 (t)

27 May 2003

Rejecting the objection (to the refutation) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.2.}

Refuting generation of other in relation to simultaneous cause and effect {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.2.}

3 June 2003

Refutation through analysing the four possibilities of the result {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.3.}

Rejecting objections based on worldly perception against the refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.}

Rejecting objections based on worldly acceptance of generation from other {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.}

Worldly objection [by the Realists]{3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.1.}

Answer [response of the Prasangikas]{3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.}

General presentation of the two truths {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.}

The two-fold division of truth {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.1.}

10 June 2003

Division of conventional truth based on worldly perception {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.}

17 June 2003

Showing the mistaken determined object to be non-existent even conventionally {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.3.}

24 June 2003 (d)

1 July 2003 (t)

8 July 2003

Relating it to the present context {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.}

Explaining the individual nature of the two truths {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.}

Conventional truth {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.1.}

15 July 2003

Ultimate truth {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.2.}

22 July 2003

Refuting worldly objections {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.4.}

Showing the worldly contradiction {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.5.}

29 July 2003

Rejecting objection through nominal non-existence of generation from other {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.2.}

The qualities of the refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.31.}

Showing inherent generation to be completely non-existent {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.}

Refuting those asserting inherent existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.}

The consequence that an arya’s equipoise would negate existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.1.}

The consequence that nominal truth would bear examination {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.2.}

5 August 2003 (d)

12 August 2003 (t)

19 August 2003

The consequence that an arya’s equipoise would negate existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.1.}

The consequence that nominal truth would bear examination {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.2.}

The consequence that ultimate generation wouldn’t be negated {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.3.}

Refuting objections to the above refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.2.}

26 August 2003

Showing the qualities of refuting generation from other with the two truths {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.}

The quality of easily refuting nihilistic and eternalistic views {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.1.}

The quality of affirming the cause-effect relationship {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.}

No need to accept a universal mind-basis if one doesn’t assert inherent existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.1.}

2 September 2003

9 September 2003

Metaphor for how an effect arises from disintegrated karma {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.2.}

16 September 2003 (d)

23 September 2003 (t)

30 September 2003

Refuting objections {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.}

Refuting that the generation of fruitional effects would become endless {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.1.}

Refuting that it would be contradictory to scriptures teaching the existence of the universal mind basis {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.2.}

Actual - giving the actual words that refute the objections that would be contradictory to the scriptures1 {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.2.1.}

7 October 2003

Example for why it was explained like that {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.2.2.}

Refuting the Mind Only School in particular {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.}

Refuting that consciousness lacking external existence exists inherently {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.}

Stating the position {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.1.}

Refuting it {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.}

Elaborate refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.}

Refuting the examples {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.}

Refuting the example of a dream {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.}

That the dream example doesn’t establish consciousness to be inherently existent {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.1.}

14 October 2003

The dream example also doesn't establish the lack of external existence while awake {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.2.}

The dream example shows all phenomena to exist falsely {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.3.}

21 October 2003

Refuting the example of seeing falling hairs {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.2.}

Refuting the meaning (that consciousness lacking an external object is being generated from karmic potential) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.}

Refuting the generation and non-generation of sense consciousness to which an outer object appears from the ripening and non-ripening of karmic potential {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.}

Presentation of the view {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.1.}

Its refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.}

Short {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.1.}

Extensive refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.}

Refuting potential to exist inherently in the present {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.1.}

Refuting potential to exist inherently in the future {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.2.}

28 October 2003 (d)

4 November 2003 (t)

11 November 2003

Refuting potential to exist inherently in the past {{3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.3.}

Refuting again the existence of consciousness without outer object {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.}

Presentation of the view {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.1.}

Its refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.2.}

18 November 2003

Showing that the refutation of the Mind Only tenet isn’t contradictory to the scriptures {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.}

Showing that the refutation doesn’t negate meditation on impurity {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.3.}

25 November 2003

Summary {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.2.}

Refuting proof that other-powered phenomena exist inherently {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.}

2 December 2003

Refuting self-knowers, the proof for other-powered phenomena {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.}

Refuting the answer to that {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.}

Actual {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.1.}

How memory is generated even without self-knower {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.2.}

10 February 2004

Refuting the Mind Only School in particular (cont.) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.}

Refuting proof that other-powered phenomena exist inherently (cont.) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.}

Refuting self-knowers, the proof for other-powered phenomena (cont.) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.}

Refuting the answer to that {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.}

How memory is generated even without a self-knower {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.2.}

17 February 2004

Refuting self-knowers with other reasoning {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.3.}

24 February 2004

Inherently existing other-powered phenomena are like the foal of a mule {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.4.}

Showing that the Mind Only system doesn’t remain within the two truths {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.2.}

2 March 2004

It is appropriate to follow Nagarjuna showing through logic {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.3.}

Showing that refuting other-powered phenomena and worldly convention isn’t the same {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.4.}

9 March 2004 (d)

16 March 2004 (t)

23 March 2004

Establishing that the word ‘only’ doesn’t negate external objects with a quote from the Sutra of the Tenth Bhumi {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.1.1.}

Establishing that very meaning with other sutras {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.1.2.}

The word ‘only’ shows the mind to be crucial {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.1.3.}

30 March 2004

Synchronicity of object and mind in existence and non-existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.2.}

The intent regarding Mind Only in the Journey to Lanka Sutra {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.}

Showing the teaching on mere mind without external object to be interpretive {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.}

Showing it to be interpretive through quotation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.1.}

Actual {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.1.1.}

Showing other similar sutras also to be interpretive {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.1.2.}

6 April 2004

Showing it to be interpretive through logic {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.2.}

Showing It To Be Interpretive Through Logic {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.2.}

Revealing the method for realising the definitive and interpretive meaning of the sutras {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.2.}

Refuting generation from both {3.5.1.1.1.2.3.}

Refuting generation from neither {3.5.1.1.1.2.3.}

13 April 2004

The meaning established through the refutation {3.5.1.1.1.3.}

Eliminating objections to this refutation {3.5.1.1.2.}

Actual {3.5.1.1.2.1.}

20 April 2004

Summary {3.5.1.1.2.2.}

Way of eliminating extreme view through dependent generation {3.5.1.1.3.}

Identifying the fruit of becoming empowered in reasoning {3.5.1.1.4.}

27 April 2004 (d)

4 May 2004 (t)

11 May 2004

Establishing the selflessness of person through logic {3.5.1.2.}

Showing that those wishing for liberation initially need to refute the self as being inherently established {3.5.1.2.1.}

18 May 2004

The way of refuting that 'I' and 'mine' are inherently established {3.5.1.2.2.}

Refuting that the self is inherently established {3.5.1.2.2.1.}

Refuting a self that is of different nature from the aggregates, as mentally fabricated by non- Buddhist schools {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.}

Expressing the position of the opponents {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.1.}

Expressing the Samkhya position {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.1.1.}

Expressing the Vaisheshika position {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.1.2.}

The refutation {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.2.}

25 May 2004

Refuting the notion of some Buddhists that the aggregates are the self. {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.}

Showing proofs harming the assertion that the aggregates are the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.}

Actual {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.1.}

Stating the assertion {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.}

The refutation of those assertions {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.1.2.}

1 June 2004

Refuting attempts at damage control by the Realists {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.}

Offering proof showing that the assertion is invalid {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.2.}

Showing other proof contradicting those asserting the aggregates to be the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.3.}

8 June 2004 (d)

15 June 2004 (t)

22 June 2004

Explaining the intent behind teaching that the aggregates are the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.; }

Explaining the meaning of teaching that all self-views are only views of the aggregates {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.1.; }

Showing the scriptural reference to be the refuting kind {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.1.1.; }

Even though the scripture is classified as affirming it doesn’t show the aggregates to be the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.1.2.; }

Refuting attempts at damage control by the Sammitiya Vaibhashika {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.1.3.; }

29 June 2004

Explaining the mere collection of the aggregates not to be the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.2.; }

The shape of the collection of aggregates isn’t the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.3.; }

Showing other reasons contradicting the assertion that the mere collection of the aggregates is the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.4.; }

The Buddha taught that the self is labelled in dependence on the six spheres etc. {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.5.; }

Showing the other systems to be unrelated {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.5.; }

6 July 2004

Refuting the remaining three, basis and dependent and so forth {3.5.1.2.2.1.3.; }

Refuting the case of basis and dependent {3.5.1.2.2.1.3.1.; }

Summing up the meaning of the refutation {3.5.1.2.2.1.3.2.; }

Refuting a person that is a substantial existent and that can’t be described as being that itself or other {3.5.1.2.2.1.4.; }

Stating the assertion {3.5.1.2.2.1.4.1.; }

13 July 2004

Stating the assertion {3.5.1.2.2.1.4.1.; }

Refuting the assertion {3.5.1.2.2.1.4.2.; }

Presentation of how the self is merely labelled in dependence upon the aggregates, together with an example {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.; }

Showing the self to be similar to the chariot in being labelled dependently while being free from the seven extremes {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.1.; }

20 July 2004 (d)

27 July 2004 (t)

3 August 2004

Showing the self to be similar to the chariot in being labelled dependently, while being free from the seven extremes (cont.) {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.}

10 August 2004

An extensive explanation of the two remaining cases not explained before. {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.}

Actual refutation {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.1.}

Refuting the assertion that the collection is the chariot {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.1.1.}

Refuting the assertion that the shape is the chariot {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.1.2.}

Transferring this logic to other objects {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.2.}

17 August 2004

Refuting objections to this explanation {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.3.}

Showing also that other nominal meanings of the label are established {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.3.}

24 August 2004

The self being posited in such a way has the quality of easily abandoning extreme ideas {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.}

Actual {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.1.}

Refuting objections {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.2.}

Linking the labels and meaning of chariot and self {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.3.}

Showing other qualities of accepting a self that is imputed dependently {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.4.}

Identifying the self that is the basis of bondage and liberation {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.5.}

Refuting that ‘mine’ is inherently established {3.5.1.2.2.2.}

31 August 2004 (d)

7 September 2004 (t)

14 September 2004

The way of refuting inherent existence of both self and ‘mine’ {3.5.1.2.3.}

Relating it to phenomena such as vases, cloth etc. {3.5.1.2.3.1.}

Relating it to cause and effect {3.5.1.2.3.2.}

The objection {3.5.1.2.3.3.}

Refuting objections to that {3.5.1.2.3.3.1.}

The answer {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.}

How one’s own refutation and affirmation is valid {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.1.}

The way of refuting the other’s position {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.1.1.}

21 September 2004

The way of establishing one’s own position {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.1.2.}

The reason why the other’s consequence isn’t the same {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.2.}

The lack of inherent existence can be established while its opposite can’t be established {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.3.}

The way of coming to understand the rest of refutations not mentioned here {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.4.}

Explaining the divisions of emptiness {6.3.5.2.}

Explaining the divisions of emptiness in brief {6.3.5.2.1.}

28 September 2004

Explaining the meaning of the individual divisions {6.3.5.2.2.}

The sixteen emptinesses {6.3.5.2.2.1.}

Inner emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.1.}

Outer emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.2.}

Outer inner emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.3.}

Emptiness of emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.4.}

Great emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.5.}

Ultimate emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.6.}

Compounded emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.7.}

Non-compounded emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.8.}

Emptiness having transcended extremes {6.3.5.2.2.1.9.}

Emptiness without beginning or end {6.3.5.2.2.1.10.}

5 October 2004

Emptiness of that not to give up {6.3.5.2.2.1.11.}

Emptiness of nature {6.3.5.2.2.1.12.}

Emptiness of all dharmas {6.3.5.2.2.1.13.}

The emptiness of one’s definition {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.}

Condensed explanation {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.1.}

Extensive explanation {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.2.}

The definitions relating to the basis {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.2.1.}

The definitions relating to the path {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.2.2.}

12 October 2004 (d)

19 October 2004 (t)

26 October 2004

The definitions relating to the result {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.2.3.}

Summary {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.3.}

The emptiness of the unobservable {6.3.5.2.2.1.15.}

The emptiness of the quintessential nature of non-functionalities {6.3.5.2.2.1.16.}

The four emptinesses {6.3.5.2.2.2.}

2 November 2004

Concluding by expressing the qualities of the ground {6.4.}

Chapter 7: The seventh ground, Gone Afar

Chapter 8: The eighth ground, Immovable

Prayers are superior on this ground and the way of awaking them from cessation {8.1}

Showing that they have exhausted all afflictions {8.2.}

Showing that they have attained ten powers {8.3.}

9 November 2004

Chapter 9: The ninth ground, ‘excellent wisdom’

Chapter 10: The tenth ground, Cloud of Dharma

Chapter 11: The individual qualities of the ten grounds

The qualities of the first ground {3.2.1.2.1.1.}

The qualities of the second to the seventh ground {3.2.1.2.1.2.}

16 November 2004

The qualities of the three pure grounds {3.2.1.2.1.3.}

Resultant ground {3.2.2.}

Mode of becoming enlightened {3.2.2.1.}

Actual {3.2.2.1.1.}

Refuting objections {3.2.2.1.2.}

The objections {3.2.2.1.2.1.}

The answer {3.2.2.1.2.2.}

Refuting the objection that it is impossible to realise suchness {3.2.2.1.2.2.1.}

Refuting the objection that it is impossible to be an exalted knower {3.2.2.1.2.2.2.}

Presentation of the bodies and qualities {3.2.2.2.}

23 November 2004

Presentation of the bodies {3.2.2.2.1.}

The truth body ( dharmakaya1) {3.2.2.2.1.1.}

The enjoyment body (sambogakaya2) {3.2.2.2.1.2.}

The body concordant with the cause (emanation body) {3.2.2.2.1.3.}

How the body and one of its pores shows all of one’s activities {3.2.2.2.1.3.1.}

How the body and one of its pores shows all the activities of others {3.2.2.2.1.3.2.}

Showing the perfect power of enlightened thought {3.2.2.2.1.3.3.}

Presentation of the qualities of the powers {3.2.2.2.2.}

Showing the ten powers in brief {3.2.2.2.2.1.}

Showing the ten powers extensively {3.2.2.2.2.2.}

The power of knowing locations and non- locations {3.2.2.2.2.2.1.}

The power of knowing the fruition of karma {3.2.2.2.2.2.2.}

The power of knowing the variety of wishes {3.2.2.2.2.2.3.}

The power of knowing the variety of spheres {3.2.2.2.2.2.4.}

The power of knowing superior and inferior faculties {3.2.2.2.2.2.5.}

The power of knowing all journeys {3.2.2.2.2.2.6.}

The power of knowing the utterly afflicted and the entirely purified {3.2.2.2.2.2.7.}

The power of knowing previous places {3.2.2.2.2.2.8.}

The power of knowing death, transference and birth of sentient beings {3.2.2.2.2.2.9.}

The power of knowing the exhaustion of contaminants {3.2.2.2.2.2.10.}

Why it is impossible to express all the qualities {3.2.2.2.2.3.}

Explaining the benefits of knowing the two qualities {3.2.2.2.2.4.}

30 November 2004

The emanation body {3.2.2.3.}

Establishing it into one path {3.2.2.4.}

From the point of view of the times of becoming enlightened and remaining {3.2.2.5.}

From the point of view of the time of becoming enlightened {3.2.2.5.1.}

From the point of view of the time of remaining {3.2.2.5.2.}

The way of composing the commentary {3.3.}

Dedicating the merits of composing the treatise {3.4.}

Colophon {4.}

Composer’s colophon {4.1.}