Madhyamakāvatāra
Supplement to the Middle Way
Commentary by the Venerable Geshe Doga
Translated by the Venerable Tenzin Dongak
Outline with links to transcripts, discussions and tests
Tara Institute
3 Mavis Avenue
East Brighton 3187
Madhyamakāvatāra
Supplement to the Middle Way
Commentary by the Venerable Geshe Doga
Homage
[Introductory sections]
Meaning of the Title {1.}
Translator's Prostration {2.}
Meaning of the Text {3.}
Homage-Method for Starting to Compose the Commentary {1.}
Praising Great Compassion Without Discerning Compassion Individually {1.1.}
Compassion as the Main Cause of a Bodhisattva {1.1.1.}
Showing the Three Main Causes of Bodhisattvas {1.1.1.}
Showing Great Compassion to also be the Root of the Other Two Causes of a Bodhisattva {1.1.2.}
2 April 2002 (d)
9 April 2002 (t)
Praising Compassion by Discerning Them Individually {1.2.}
Prostration to Compassion Focussing on Sentient Beings {1.2.1.}
Compassion Focussing on Dharmas and Non-Focus {1.2.2.}
14 May 2002 (d)
28 May 2002 (t)
The Actual Body of the Text {2.}
The Causal Grounds {2.1.}
The Way of Practising the Path on the Basis of One's Present Rebirth {2.1.1.}
The Way of Practising the Path as an Ordinary Bodhisattva {2.1.2.}
The Way of Practising the Path as an Arya Bodhisattva {2.1.3.}
The Presentation of the Ten Bodhisattva Grounds in General {2.1.3.1.}
Explaining the Ten Bodhisattva Grounds Individually {2.1.3.2.}
Explaining the First Five Grounds {2.1.3.2.1.}
Chapter 1: Extremely Joyful
Nature of the Ground {1.}
Showing Extensively the Qualities of the Ground {2.}
The Qualities Beautifying the Continuum of the Practitioner {2.1.}
Explaining Those Qualities Individually {2.1.1.}
The Quality of Having Attained a Meaningful Name {2.1.1.1.}
The Four Qualities of Being Born into the Lineage and so forth {2.1.1.2.}
The Three Qualities of Conquering Higher Grounds and so forth {2.1.1.3.}
Showing the Qualities in a Condensed Manner {2.1.2.}
The Qualities of Outshining the Continuum of Others {2.2.}
Outshining Hearers and Self-Liberators Through Lineage {2.2.1.}
Outshining Both Hearers and Self-Liberators on the Seventh Ground Through Awareness {2.2.2.}
2 July 2002 (d)
9 July 2002 (t)
The Way a Bodhisattva on the Seventh Ground Outshines the Hearers and Self-liberator Vehicles Through Awareness {2.2.2.}
Explaining the Meaning That Has Been Established Through the Previous Points {2.2.3.}
Showing that the Sutra of the Ten Bhumis Explains that Hearers and Self-liberators Realise Phenomena as Lacking Natural Existence {2.2.3.1.}
Clarification of the Thought of Chandrakirti {2.2.3.1.1.}
Showing this also to be according to the Bodhisattva Charyavatara {2.2.3.1.2.; p.}
Sources Proving That Hearers and Self- Liberators Need to Realise Emptiness in Order to Attain Liberation {2.2.3.2.}
Mahayana Sutras {2.2.3.2.1.}
Commentaries and Hinayana Sutras {2.2.3.2.2.}
Eliminating Doubt {2.2.3.3.}
Eliminating Doubts Outlined in Chandrakirti’s Self Commentary {2.2.3.3.1.}
Eliminating Doubts Not Mentioned in the {2.2.3.3.2.}
The Superiority of the Perfection {2.3.}
Explaining the Generosity of the First Ground {2.3.1.}
Explaining Generosity of a Lower Base {2.3.2.}
Attaining Samsaric Happiness Through Generosity {2.3.2.1.}
Attaining the Happiness of Nirvana Through Generosity {2.3.2.2.}
13 August 2002 (d)
20 August 2002 (t)
Showing the Uncommon Benefits of a Bodhisattva’s Generosity {2.3.3.}
Showing Generosity to be the Main Advice for Both Bases {2.3.3.1.}
Showing Which Joy Bodhisattvas Experience at the Time of Generosity {2.3.3.2.; p.}
Showing Whether or Not Bodhisattvas Experience Pain at the Time of Giving Away Their Body {2.3.3.3.}
The Divisions of the Perfection of Generosity {2.3.4.}
Qualities of the Ground: {3.}
Chapter 2: The second ground, Stainless
Showing Morality on This Ground to be Extremely Pure {1.}
Showing Morality on this Ground to be Perfect {1.1.}
Showing the Related Qualities to be Very Pure {1.2.}
Showing its morality to be superior to that on the first ground {1.3.}
Showing the Other Cause of Completely Pure Morality {1.4.}
Practising Morality {2.}
Enjoying the fruits of generosity and happy migrations depends upon morality {2.1.}
Enjoying the fruits of generosity continuously depends upon morality {2.2.}
Showing it to be extremely difficult to be liberated from the lower realms if separated from morality {2.3.}
The reason for teaching morality subsequently to generosity {2.4.}
Praising morality as the cause for both higher status and definite goodness {2.5.}
Metaphor for being unmixed with the opposite of morality {3.}
Divisions of morality {4.}
Concluding briefly by expressing the qualities of the ground {5.}
Chapter 3: The third ground, Luminous
Description of the ground - basis of the characteristics {1.}
Explaining the characteristics of the ground {2.}
Showing Patience to be Superior on this Ground {2.1.}
The Way of Relying on Other Types of Patience {2.2.}
Showing that it is Inappropriate to be Angry {2.2.1.}
Anger Is Inappropriate Because It Has No Purpose and Great Disadvantages {2.2.1.1.}
1 October 2002 (t)
To retaliate is contradictory to not desiring subsequent suffering {2.2.1.2.}
Anger is inappropriate because it destroys the virtue accumulated over long periods of time {2.2.1.3.}
Meaning of the text {2.2.1.3.1.}
Ancillary Meanings {2.2.1.3.2.}
Stopping Anger After Having Contemplated the Many Faults of Impatience {2.2.1.4.}
Contemplating the Many Benefits of Patience. {2.2.2.}
Outlining the Individual Benefits of Patience {2.2.2.1.}
Advice to Rely on Patience as a Short Summary {2.2.2.2.}
Divisions of the Perfection of Patience {2.3.}
Showing the Other Pure Qualities Arising on This Ground {2.4.}
Qualities of Realisation {2.4.1.}
Qualities of Abandonment {2.4.2.}
The Characteristics of the First Three Perfections {3.}
Summarising Briefly by Expressing the Qualities of the Ground {4.}
Chapter 4: The fourth ground, Radiant
Showing enthusiasm to be superior on this ground {1.}
Showing Enthusiasm to be Superior on this Ground {1.}
Description of the Ground {2.}
Showing the Attributes of Abandonment?? {3.}
Chapter 5: The fifth ground, Difficult to Train
Description of the Ground {1.}
Showing Mental Stabilisation as Superior and Having Expertise in Truth {2.}
Chapter 6: The sixth ground, The Manifest
5 November 2002 (d)
12 November 2002 (t)
Description of the Ground and Showing the Perfection of Wisdom to be Supreme {1.}
Praise of the Perfection of Wisdom {2.}
Explaining the Suchness of Dependent Arising {3.}
Pledging to Explain the Profound {3.1.}
Identifying the Vessel for the Profound {3.2.}
The Way the Ensuing Qualities Are Generated {3.3.}
Exhorting the Student Who Is a Vessel to Listen {3.1.}
Explaining the Suchness of Dependent Arising {3.}
The Way Suchness of Dependent Arising Is Explained {3.5.}
How the Ultimate Meaning Is Explained Through Scripture {3.5.1.}
Stating How Suchness Is Explained Through Scripture {3.5.1.1.}
Identifying What Is Discordant With Knowing Suchness {3.5.1.2.}
Identifying True Grasping According to the Svatantrika Madhyamika Tenet {3.5.1.2.1.}
Identifying True Existence and True Grasping [According to Svatantrikas] {3.5.1.2.1.1.}
Showing what is true and false according to worldly perception with the example of illusion [Svatantrika view]{3.5.1.2.1.2.}
Explaining True and False Existence with the Metaphor of Illusion and the Illusionist {3.5.1.2.1.1.2.}
Applying the Example to the Meaning {3.5.1.2.1.1.3.}
Object of Negation According to the Prasangika {3.5.1.2.2.}
The Presentation of Being Posited Through the Power of Conception {3.5.1.2.2.1.}
Showing how grasping at the reverse of merely labelled by conception is true grasping {3.5.1.2.2.2.}
1 April 2003 (d)
8 April 2003 (t)
The way emptiness is established by valid reasoning {3.5.2.}
Establishing the selflessness of phenomena through reason {3.5.2.1.}
Negating generation from the two extremes on the basis of both truths {3.5.2.1.1.}
Asserting the thesis of the lack of inherent generation {3.5.2.1.1.1.}
Establishing the thesis through reasoning {3.5.2.1.1.2.}
Refuting generation from self {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.}
Refutation with the reasoning from the Commentary {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.; p.}
Refuting the tenet holders asserting the realisation of suchness {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.}
Refuting generation from a cause that is of one nature (with the effect) {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.}
The consequential meaninglessness if generated from a cause that is of one nature with it {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.}
Being contrary to reason if so generated {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.2.}
Refuting Objections {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.3.}
Refuting cause and effect being of one nature {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.2.}
Refutation with the consequence that the shape etc. of seed and sprout would become one {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.2.1.}
Refuting the answer of the Samkhya to that consequence {{3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.2.2.}
Refutation with the consequence of concomitant apprehension {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.1.2.3.}
Its non-existence also according to common convention {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.1.2.}
Summary of the refutation {3.3.2.1.1.2.1.1.3.}
Refutation through the reasoning of Root Wisdom {3.5.2.1.1.2.1.2.}
Refutation of [generation of] self from other {3.5.2.1.1.2.2.}
Stating the previous position {3.5.2.1.1.2.2.1.}
Refuting the position of generation from other {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.}
Refuting generation from other in general{3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.}
The actual refutation of generation from other {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.1.}
The general refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.}
Refutation by impossible consequence {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.1.}
Rejecting objections to that {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.2.1.}
Rejecting the refutation (this heading is a bit out) {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.1.2.2.}
Particular refutation {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.}
Refuting generation from other in relation to consecutive cause and effect {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.}
The actual refutation {3.5.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.1.}
13 May 2003 (d)
20 May 2003 (t)
Rejecting the objection (to the refutation) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.1.2.}
Refuting generation of other in relation to simultaneous cause and effect {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.2.2.}
Refutation through analysing the four possibilities of the result {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.1.3.}
Rejecting objections based on worldly perception against the refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.}
Rejecting objections based on worldly acceptance of generation from other {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.}
Worldly objection [by the Realists]{3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.1.}
Answer [response of the Prasangikas]{3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.}
General presentation of the two truths {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.}
The two-fold division of truth {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.1.}
Division of conventional truth based on worldly perception {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.}
Showing the mistaken determined object to be non-existent even conventionally {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.3.}
24 June 2003 (d)
1 July 2003 (t)
Relating it to the present context {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.}
Explaining the individual nature of the two truths {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.}
Conventional truth {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.1.}
Ultimate truth {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.2.}
Refuting worldly objections {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.4.}
Showing the worldly contradiction {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.5.}
Rejecting objection through nominal non-existence of generation from other {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.2.2.}
The qualities of the refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.31.}
Showing inherent generation to be completely non-existent {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.}
Refuting those asserting inherent existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.}
The consequence that an arya’s equipoise would negate existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.1.}
The consequence that nominal truth would bear examination {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.2.}
5 August 2003 (d)
12 August 2003 (t)
The consequence that an arya’s equipoise would negate existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.1.}
The consequence that nominal truth would bear examination {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.2.}
The consequence that ultimate generation wouldn’t be negated {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.1.3.}
Refuting objections to the above refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.4.2.}
Showing the qualities of refuting generation from other with the two truths {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.}
The quality of easily refuting nihilistic and eternalistic views {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.1.}
The quality of affirming the cause-effect relationship {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.}
No need to accept a universal mind-basis if one doesn’t assert inherent existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.1.}
Metaphor for how an effect arises from disintegrated karma {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.2.}
Refuting objections {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.}
Refuting that the generation of fruitional effects would become endless {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.1.}
Refuting that it would be contradictory to scriptures teaching the existence of the universal mind basis {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.2.}
Actual - giving the actual words that refute the objections that would be contradictory to the scriptures1 {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.2.1.}
Example for why it was explained like that {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.1.5.2.3.2.2.}
Refuting the Mind Only School in particular {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.}
Refuting that consciousness lacking external existence exists inherently {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.}
Stating the position {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.1.}
Refuting it {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.}
Elaborate refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.}
Refuting the examples {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.}
Refuting the example of a dream {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.}
That the dream example doesn’t establish consciousness to be inherently existent {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.1.}
The dream example also doesn't establish the lack of external existence while awake {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.2.}
The dream example shows all phenomena to exist falsely {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.3.}
Refuting the example of seeing falling hairs {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.1.2.}
Refuting the meaning (that consciousness lacking an external object is being generated from karmic potential) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.}
Refuting the generation and non-generation of sense consciousness to which an outer object appears from the ripening and non-ripening of karmic potential {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.}
Presentation of the view {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.1.}
Its refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.}
Short {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.1.}
Extensive refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.}
Refuting potential to exist inherently in the present {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.1.}
Refuting potential to exist inherently in the future {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.2.}
28 October 2003 (d)
4 November 2003 (t)
Refuting potential to exist inherently in the past {{3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.1.2.2.3.}
Refuting again the existence of consciousness without outer object {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.}
Presentation of the view {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.1.}
Its refutation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.2.2.}
Showing that the refutation of the Mind Only tenet isn’t contradictory to the scriptures {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.2.3.}
Showing that the refutation doesn’t negate meditation on impurity {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.1.3.}
Summary {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.1.2.2.}
Refuting proof that other-powered phenomena exist inherently {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.}
Refuting self-knowers, the proof for other-powered phenomena {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.}
Refuting the answer to that {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.}
Actual {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.1.}
How memory is generated even without self-knower {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.2.}
Refuting the Mind Only School in particular (cont.) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.}
Refuting proof that other-powered phenomena exist inherently (cont.) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.}
Refuting self-knowers, the proof for other-powered phenomena (cont.) {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.}
Refuting the answer to that {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.}
How memory is generated even without a self-knower {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.2.2.}
Refuting self-knowers with other reasoning {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.3.}
Inherently existing other-powered phenomena are like the foal of a mule {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.1.4.}
Showing that the Mind Only system doesn’t remain within the two truths {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.2.}
It is appropriate to follow Nagarjuna showing through logic {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.3.}
Showing that refuting other-powered phenomena and worldly convention isn’t the same {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.2.4.}
9 March 2004 (d)
16 March 2004 (t)
Establishing that the word ‘only’ doesn’t negate external objects with a quote from the Sutra of the Tenth Bhumi {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.1.1.}
Establishing that very meaning with other sutras {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.1.2.}
The word ‘only’ shows the mind to be crucial {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.1.3.}
Synchronicity of object and mind in existence and non-existence {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.2.}
The intent regarding Mind Only in the Journey to Lanka Sutra {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.}
Showing the teaching on mere mind without external object to be interpretive {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.}
Showing it to be interpretive through quotation {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.1.}
Actual {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.1.1.}
Showing other similar sutras also to be interpretive {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.1.2.}
Showing it to be interpretive through logic {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.2.}
Showing It To Be Interpretive Through Logic {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.1.2.}
Revealing the method for realising the definitive and interpretive meaning of the sutras {3.5.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.2.}
Refuting generation from both {3.5.1.1.1.2.3.}
Refuting generation from neither {3.5.1.1.1.2.3.}
The meaning established through the refutation {3.5.1.1.1.3.}
Eliminating objections to this refutation {3.5.1.1.2.}
Actual {3.5.1.1.2.1.}
Summary {3.5.1.1.2.2.}
Way of eliminating extreme view through dependent generation {3.5.1.1.3.}
Identifying the fruit of becoming empowered in reasoning {3.5.1.1.4.}
27 April 2004 (d)
4 May 2004 (t)
Establishing the selflessness of person through logic {3.5.1.2.}
Showing that those wishing for liberation initially need to refute the self as being inherently established {3.5.1.2.1.}
The way of refuting that 'I' and 'mine' are inherently established {3.5.1.2.2.}
Refuting that the self is inherently established {3.5.1.2.2.1.}
Refuting a self that is of different nature from the aggregates, as mentally fabricated by non- Buddhist schools {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.}
Expressing the position of the opponents {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.1.}
Expressing the Samkhya position {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.1.1.}
Expressing the Vaisheshika position {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.1.2.}
The refutation {3.5.1.2.2.1.1.2.}
Refuting the notion of some Buddhists that the aggregates are the self. {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.}
Showing proofs harming the assertion that the aggregates are the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.}
Actual {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.1.}
Stating the assertion {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.1.1.}
The refutation of those assertions {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.1.2.}
Refuting attempts at damage control by the Realists {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.1.2.}
Offering proof showing that the assertion is invalid {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.2.}
Showing other proof contradicting those asserting the aggregates to be the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.3.}
8 June 2004 (d)
15 June 2004 (t)
Explaining the intent behind teaching that the aggregates are the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.; }
Explaining the meaning of teaching that all self-views are only views of the aggregates {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.1.; }
Showing the scriptural reference to be the refuting kind {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.1.1.; }
Even though the scripture is classified as affirming it doesn’t show the aggregates to be the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.1.2.; }
Refuting attempts at damage control by the Sammitiya Vaibhashika {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.1.3.; }
Explaining the mere collection of the aggregates not to be the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.2.; }
The shape of the collection of aggregates isn’t the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.3.; }
Showing other reasons contradicting the assertion that the mere collection of the aggregates is the self {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.4.; }
The Buddha taught that the self is labelled in dependence on the six spheres etc. {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.4.5.; }
Showing the other systems to be unrelated {3.5.1.2.2.1.2.5.; }
Refuting the remaining three, basis and dependent and so forth {3.5.1.2.2.1.3.; }
Refuting the case of basis and dependent {3.5.1.2.2.1.3.1.; }
Summing up the meaning of the refutation {3.5.1.2.2.1.3.2.; }
Refuting a person that is a substantial existent and that can’t be described as being that itself or other {3.5.1.2.2.1.4.; }
Stating the assertion {3.5.1.2.2.1.4.1.; }
Stating the assertion {3.5.1.2.2.1.4.1.; }
Refuting the assertion {3.5.1.2.2.1.4.2.; }
Presentation of how the self is merely labelled in dependence upon the aggregates, together with an example {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.; }
Showing the self to be similar to the chariot in being labelled dependently while being free from the seven extremes {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.1.; }
20 July 2004 (d)
27 July 2004 (t)
Showing the self to be similar to the chariot in being labelled dependently, while being free from the seven extremes (cont.) {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.}
An extensive explanation of the two remaining cases not explained before. {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.}
Actual refutation {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.1.}
Refuting the assertion that the collection is the chariot {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.1.1.}
Refuting the assertion that the shape is the chariot {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.1.2.}
Transferring this logic to other objects {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.2.2.}
Refuting objections to this explanation {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.3.}
Showing also that other nominal meanings of the label are established {3.5.1.2.2.1.5.3.}
The self being posited in such a way has the quality of easily abandoning extreme ideas {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.}
Actual {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.1.}
Refuting objections {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.2.}
Linking the labels and meaning of chariot and self {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.3.}
Showing other qualities of accepting a self that is imputed dependently {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.4.}
Identifying the self that is the basis of bondage and liberation {3.5.1.2.2.1.6.5.}
Refuting that ‘mine’ is inherently established {3.5.1.2.2.2.}
31 August 2004 (d)
7 September 2004 (t)
The way of refuting inherent existence of both self and ‘mine’ {3.5.1.2.3.}
Relating it to phenomena such as vases, cloth etc. {3.5.1.2.3.1.}
Relating it to cause and effect {3.5.1.2.3.2.}
The objection {3.5.1.2.3.3.}
Refuting objections to that {3.5.1.2.3.3.1.}
The answer {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.}
How one’s own refutation and affirmation is valid {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.1.}
The way of refuting the other’s position {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.1.1.}
The way of establishing one’s own position {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.1.2.}
The reason why the other’s consequence isn’t the same {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.2.}
The lack of inherent existence can be established while its opposite can’t be established {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.3.}
The way of coming to understand the rest of refutations not mentioned here {3.5.1.2.3.3.2.4.}
Explaining the divisions of emptiness {6.3.5.2.}
Explaining the divisions of emptiness in brief {6.3.5.2.1.}
Explaining the meaning of the individual divisions {6.3.5.2.2.}
The sixteen emptinesses {6.3.5.2.2.1.}
Inner emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.1.}
Outer emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.2.}
Outer inner emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.3.}
Emptiness of emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.4.}
Great emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.5.}
Ultimate emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.6.}
Compounded emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.7.}
Non-compounded emptiness {6.3.5.2.2.1.8.}
Emptiness having transcended extremes {6.3.5.2.2.1.9.}
Emptiness without beginning or end {6.3.5.2.2.1.10.}
Emptiness of that not to give up {6.3.5.2.2.1.11.}
Emptiness of nature {6.3.5.2.2.1.12.}
Emptiness of all dharmas {6.3.5.2.2.1.13.}
The emptiness of one’s definition {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.}
Condensed explanation {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.1.}
Extensive explanation {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.2.}
The definitions relating to the basis {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.2.1.}
The definitions relating to the path {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.2.2.}
12 October 2004 (d)
19 October 2004 (t)
The definitions relating to the result {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.2.3.}
Summary {6.3.5.2.2.1.14.3.}
The emptiness of the unobservable {6.3.5.2.2.1.15.}
The emptiness of the quintessential nature of non-functionalities {6.3.5.2.2.1.16.}
The four emptinesses {6.3.5.2.2.2.}
Concluding by expressing the qualities of the ground {6.4.}
Chapter 7: The seventh ground, Gone Afar
Chapter 8: The eighth ground, Immovable
Prayers are superior on this ground and the way of awaking them from cessation {8.1}
Showing that they have exhausted all afflictions {8.2.}
Showing that they have attained ten powers {8.3.}
Chapter 9: The ninth ground, ‘excellent wisdom’
Chapter 10: The tenth ground, Cloud of Dharma
Chapter 11: The individual qualities of the ten grounds
The qualities of the first ground {3.2.1.2.1.1.}
The qualities of the second to the seventh ground {3.2.1.2.1.2.}
The qualities of the three pure grounds {3.2.1.2.1.3.}
Resultant ground {3.2.2.}
Mode of becoming enlightened {3.2.2.1.}
Actual {3.2.2.1.1.}
Refuting objections {3.2.2.1.2.}
The objections {3.2.2.1.2.1.}
The answer {3.2.2.1.2.2.}
Refuting the objection that it is impossible to realise suchness {3.2.2.1.2.2.1.}
Refuting the objection that it is impossible to be an exalted knower {3.2.2.1.2.2.2.}
Presentation of the bodies and qualities {3.2.2.2.}
Presentation of the bodies {3.2.2.2.1.}
The truth body ( dharmakaya1) {3.2.2.2.1.1.}
The enjoyment body (sambogakaya2) {3.2.2.2.1.2.}
The body concordant with the cause (emanation body) {3.2.2.2.1.3.}
How the body and one of its pores shows all of one’s activities {3.2.2.2.1.3.1.}
How the body and one of its pores shows all the activities of others {3.2.2.2.1.3.2.}
Showing the perfect power of enlightened thought {3.2.2.2.1.3.3.}
Presentation of the qualities of the powers {3.2.2.2.2.}
Showing the ten powers in brief {3.2.2.2.2.1.}
Showing the ten powers extensively {3.2.2.2.2.2.}
The power of knowing locations and non- locations {3.2.2.2.2.2.1.}
The power of knowing the fruition of karma {3.2.2.2.2.2.2.}
The power of knowing the variety of wishes {3.2.2.2.2.2.3.}
The power of knowing the variety of spheres {3.2.2.2.2.2.4.}
The power of knowing superior and inferior faculties {3.2.2.2.2.2.5.}
The power of knowing all journeys {3.2.2.2.2.2.6.}
The power of knowing the utterly afflicted and the entirely purified {3.2.2.2.2.2.7.}
The power of knowing previous places {3.2.2.2.2.2.8.}
The power of knowing death, transference and birth of sentient beings {3.2.2.2.2.2.9.}
The power of knowing the exhaustion of contaminants {3.2.2.2.2.2.10.}
Why it is impossible to express all the qualities {3.2.2.2.2.3.}
Explaining the benefits of knowing the two qualities {3.2.2.2.2.4.}
The emanation body {3.2.2.3.}
Establishing it into one path {3.2.2.4.}
From the point of view of the times of becoming enlightened and remaining {3.2.2.5.}
From the point of view of the time of becoming enlightened {3.2.2.5.1.}
From the point of view of the time of remaining {3.2.2.5.2.}
The way of composing the commentary {3.3.}
Dedicating the merits of composing the treatise {3.4.}
Colophon {4.}
Composer’s colophon {4.1.}